lONG iSLAND cOLLABORATIVE lAW aTTORNEYS

What Is Collaborative Law?

Divorcing spouses who do not seek to go straight to litigation may consider an alternative dispute resolution method called “collaborative law.” In this process, each spouse is represented by a specially trained collaborative lawyer. Spouses will sit together with their lawyers in face-to-face meetings to identify and address the issues they need to resolve to separate. This might involve financial planning and mental health professionals to settle matters like property division and child support. Note that if either spouse wants to go to court, the collaborative process ends. 

In the collaborative law process, the lawyers and parties will all work together rather than as adversaries as in the traditional divorce trial. Spouses will have meetings with their own lawyers and the other professionals on their side, and both parties will convene to craft a final agreement. The non-adversarial nature of collaborative law allows the divorcing spouses more room to negotiate the outcome they want, rather than deferring to a judge’s default decision. This also means the agreement may last longer and be more robust, as both spouses themselves proposed and agreed to the provisions.

Collaborative law offers several benefits that can make it an appealing approach for resolving legal disputes, especially in family law cases like divorce or custody battles. Here are some of the key advantages:

• Empowerment: Collaborative law empowers individuals to actively participate in crafting their own solutions. It allows parties to have a voice in the outcome rather than leaving the decisions solely in the hands of a judge.
• Privacy: Collaborative law proceedings are usually confidential. This confidentiality can be reassuring for parties who wish to keep personal matters out of the public eye, unlike court proceedings which are typically public record.
• Reduced Conflict: This approach promotes a less adversarial atmosphere compared to traditional litigation. Parties commit to open communication and negotiation, which can help in reducing hostility and animosity between them.
• Efficiency: Collaborative law often moves faster than traditional litigation. By focusing on problem-solving rather than court dates and procedures, the process can be more efficient, potentially saving time and money.
• Tailored Solutions: Parties have more control and flexibility in shaping solutions that work for their specific circumstances. This can lead to more creative and customized agreements that better suit the needs of everyone involved.
• Preservation of Relationships: Particularly in family law cases, maintaining amicable relationships, especially when children are involved, is often a priority. Collaborative law aims to preserve relationships by fostering cooperation rather than contention.
• Emotional Support: Collaborative law often involves interdisciplinary teams, including lawyers, financial experts, and mental health professionals. These professionals can provide emotional support and guidance throughout the process, helping parties navigate difficult decisions.
• Post-Divorce Relationships: By emphasizing cooperation and understanding during the process, collaborative law can set a positive tone for future interactions, which can be especially beneficial when ongoing cooperation is necessary, such as co-parenting.

Overall, collaborative law offers an alternative approach that prioritizes mutual respect, problem-solving, and cooperation, aiming to reach fair and mutually agreeable resolutions while minimizing the negative impact of legal disputes on relationships and well-being.

Is Collaborative Law Right for You?

Determining if collaborative law is suitable for your situation involves considering various factors. Here are some steps to help you assess whether collaborative law is the right approach:

• Nature of the Dispute: Collaborative law is often effective for disputes involving family matters like divorce, child custody, or disputes between co-parents. Consider whether your situation involves ongoing relationships where cooperation is important.
• Willingness to Collaborate: All parties involved must be willing to engage in open dialogue and negotiation. If one or both parties are not willing to communicate or compromise, collaborative law may not be the best option.
• Desire for Control and Input: If you prefer having more control over the outcome and want to actively participate in crafting solutions rather than having a judge decide for you, collaborative law could be a good fit.
• Emotional Readiness: Collaborative law can involve direct communication between parties. Consider whether you and the other party are emotionally ready to engage in this process without escalating conflict or becoming overly distressed.
• Complexity of the Situation: Collaborative law might not be suitable for highly complex legal issues or situations involving abuse, extreme power imbalances, or where one party is acting in bad faith. In such cases, a more adversarial approach might be necessary to protect your rights.
• Commitment to the Process: All parties, including attorneys, must commit to the collaborative process. If any party involved prefers a more traditional litigation route, the collaborative approach may not work effectively.
• Cost Consideration: While collaborative law can be more cost-effective than litigation, it still involves fees for attorneys and potentially other professionals involved. Consider your financial situation and whether this method aligns with your budget.
• Legal Counsel: Ensure you consult with a collaborative law attorney who can provide guidance tailored to your specific circumstances. They can help assess whether collaborative law is appropriate for your situation and explain its benefits and limitations.

Remember, the decision to pursue collaborative law should be made after careful consideration of these factors and after consulting with legal professionals who specialize in this approach. It's important to choose the method that best aligns with your goals, priorities, and the nature of your dispute.